Reasonable Action
Welcome! Below is an article by permission of Bill Huff, Editor of the SAP Fellowship news letter "Reasonable Action". Thank you Bill and SAPF. This usually 24 page newsletter comes out about every other month. Below is a small sampling of the many excellent articles from our news letter available only to our members. You are in store for a treat! As members we receive some of the best insightful discussions on issues related to our liberty, as you will soon discover. As citizens of this historically great country of ours let's be sure it remains ours by taking "Reasonable Action"! Enjoy!
Exam Certified Independent Representative for the
Save A Patriot Fellowship
"Reasonable Action"
Newsletter of the SAPF
The following is a sample article from a past edition of the Fellowship newsletter, "Reasonable Action." (Subscriptions are available to SAPF members only.) All articles Copyrighted at Common Law by Save-A-Patriot Fellowship.
ARTICLE
$12.5K SETTLEMENT - N.W.R.C. WORKS
[EXHIBIT "A" displayed on the front page reads as follows]
November 7, 1996
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
John B. Kotmair, Jr.
Director, National Worker's Rights Committee
12 Carroll Street
Westminster, MD 21157-9999
Dear Mr. Kotmair:
Accompanying this letter are the Settlement Agreement and Release and Voluntary Dismissal form. Please review the language of both documents. If you are satisfied with the language, please sign where indicated and return to us for filing with the Administrative Law Judge. Upon approval by the Administrative Law Judge, we will immediately forward to you the settlement draft in the amount of $12,500.00. Please call with any questions. Thank you.
Sincerely,
[name withheld]
_________________________________________________________________________
We are winning!!! We are winning and when we win America wins!
The National Workers' Rights Committee is an auxiliary to the Save-A-Patriot Fellowship, formed to help fellowship members in their efforts to assert their Constitutional prerogative to live and work in the States of the Union without participating in the welfare state via the Social Security entitlement programs offered [not imposed] within subtitle "C" of the Internal Revenue Code.
The letter you see on the front page of this RA is a landmark in our efforts to educate employers, tax professionals, attorneys, the courts, the federal agencies [the Social Security Administration, the IRS, the EEOC, the U.S. Justice Department etc.] and the public at large, with regard to the true and limited application of employment taxes within the Internal Revenue Code as regards American citizens living and working within the States of the Union who desire to work free and live free. We ask no more than compliance with the laws of the United States as written, along with the maintenance of the rights of American citizens secured by the Constitution and the laws made in pursuance thereof.
It would seem to many that all we need to do is show the law to an employer or prospective employer of one of our members. We should just be able to reveal certain documented facts and procedures, clearly outlined in the written statutes, the tax regulations and promulgated forms and procedures, and have the employers and their tax professionals and counsel read the law and join us in the assertion of rights in accordance with the law.
In fact, as we give free public meetings every Saturday night and our independent representatives offer seminars across the country, someone in practically every meeting will say, "What happens when you show this documentation to an employer; a lawyer; a lawmaker? Can't they simply read it and apply the law as written?" At which point John Kotmair will smile and say, "Let me tell you something! If it were that simple, you and I wouldn't be here and there would be no need for this organization! You must understand that you are dealing with a mind set."
I will go a step further. When you suggest that every citizen is not required to participate in the welfare entitlement scheme under subtitle "C" of the Internal Revenue Code and that if they have only ever lived and worked within the States of the Union, you are attacking their entire paradigm of reality. To quote a well-worn cliché: It's not what you know, it's what you know that just ain't so! The educational establishment; the government bureaucracy; the Media; the tax professions; the banking and investment industries, have all at least tacitly sworn eternal allegiance to the status quo. To them it is a matter of fervent religious conviction.
Every example of an American citizen living and working without the Number, flies in the face of that status quo. It proves Americans can still live free according to the written laws of the United States.
N.W.R.C. is on the national vanguard in these efforts. When an employer and/or his tax pro or attorney are ready and willing to know the truth, they can find it here (along with all of the necessary documents, forms and procedures). If an employer wants to understand how, according to law, he can both hire and pay citizens within the States of the Union (entirely apart from any participation by himself or others in any welfare entitlement system under subtitle "C" of the Internal Revenue Code) he can learn the truth here.
For several years we have been telling you about examples of those who filed an Affidavit of Revocation and Rescission for their application for the Social Security Number and have given a Statement of Citizenship to their employer. After the employer had sent a copy of the Statement of Citizenship to the International Service Center in Philadelphia, we have consistently reported that that was the end of that. When and where the law has been observed we have been able to predict the results with great regularity.
The problem comes when (because of their mind set) employers and their tax consultants have been conditioned to reject anything that doesn't fit their paradigm. Their responses range from disbelief to the simple admission that they believe the IRS wants them to do things a certain way and that they are more afraid of the IRS than they are of us. However, when "us" wins a settlement of this nature, we have acquired another powerful piece of evidence that tends to fit into their system of logic better than mere documented proof. It has the tendency of making them consider its possible ramifications for their own pocketbooks [very near the heart in most businessmen].
They reason within themselves, "If someone had to settle out of court for $12.5K, perhaps these people are not so nuts after all. Maybe I should take another look at their documentation."
If it really is "legal," what could be more convenient to an employer than not getting an Employer's Identification Number [E.I.N.]; not getting a Social Security Number; not withholding any federal taxes related to "employment;" not having any federal employment tax forms to file? Could this have something to do with the Framers mind set when they said, "No State shall... pass any...Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts [Article I - Section 10 - Clause 1]?"
Why else does the Social Security Administration publicly and consistently admit the following?
"The Social Security Act does not require an individual to have a Social Security number (SSN) to live and work in the United States, nor does it require an SSN simply for the purpose of having one. However, if an individual works without an SSN, we cannot properly credit the earnings for the work performed." [enclosed in a letter from Vincent Sanudo, Director of the Office of Public Inquiries of the Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, Baltimore, MD, April 14, 1995 - emphasis added],
OR
"...a person with no social security number would have no taxable income." - From an earlier public relations release of the SSA.
We acknowledge the fact that there are many with vested interests in the welfare state and that they will be reluctant to give up their entrenched positions. It may be difficult for them to envision their lives being redirected toward something that is truly creative or productive. We have our vested interest in liberty. The examples and proof above support our paradigm - not theirs. Let's shout it from the rooftops: America, you are still free if you are willing to live free!
Important Details
The letter we cited on the front page is not from a case where someone was discharged for not having a Social Security Number. It was from a case wherein the applicant for a position [an S.A.P., Member] was refused employment on the ground that he was unwilling to provide a Social Security Number. The employer's counsel apparently recognized the lawfulness of our position to the extent that he advised the employer to offer an out-of-court settlement.
It seems someone is beginning to get an education. For once, someone who was previously willing to injure another citizen contrary to his rights has born part of the expense of re-educating the American people. Until now, most of the cost had been paid by those who suffered unjustly merely because they were willing to suffer loss in order to preserve their rights and pass along the heritage of liberty to their children.
The tide is turning!
A Personal Invitation
I invite those of you who currently may be experiencing challenges with the IRS or just wish to explore your options under the law to message me at:
We will be glad to get back to you.
[
GUEST BOOK ]
[
[
[ NEW VICTORY EXPRESS!! ] [ COMMENTS-QUESTIONS! ]
[ Reasonable Action ] [ The Truth Behind the Income Tax! ] [ Products ]
[ Social Security? ] [ Tax Basics 101 ] [ Just the Facts ] [ What is SAP ]
[ UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ] [ GAO AUDITS THE IRS! ]
[ Do you love America? How about the IRS? ] [ Why I did this site ]