----Original Message-----
From: taxtruth4u
Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2003 9:01 AM
To: taxtruth4u
Subject: The power of the media
"I fear three newspapers more than 100,000 bayonetts."--Napoleon Bonaparte
Because of the media's incredible influence and power it is not hard to understand why the power brokers would seek to control it. In fact it is not only likely it is a historical fact.
The following is an excerpt for none other then the Congressional Record of 1917 on page 2949. I challenge you to give serious thought to what you are about to read. The ramifications effect all of us on a daily basis. So without further ado, I quote,
"In March, 1915, ( No, 1915 is not a typo. This has been going on for a looooong time. So long that when we DO hear the truth we don't recognize it ) the *J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world ( think this may have carried through to other forms as communications expanded, such as TV etc? Hmmmm, could beee. ) and employed them to select the influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press of the United States. These 12 men worked the problem ( Problem? What problem? Whose got a problem? JP Morgan and "interests"? Hmmmm? ) out by selecting 179 newspapers, and then began, by an elimination process, to retain only those necessary for the purpose of controlling the general policy of the daily press throughout the country. They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. The 25 papers were agreed upon: emissaries were sent to purchase the policy, national and international, of these papers; an agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interest of ( WHO? the citizens? Our country? Our Government. NO!!! ) the PURCHASERS. ( emphasis mine. All for freedom of the press. Wonder why the founders thought freedom of the press was so important? Ahhh, they are just a bunch of outdated old fogies anyway, right? ) This contract is in existence at the present time, and it accounts for the news columns of the daily press of the country." END OF QUOTE! Did you GET it? Read it again and let it SINK in.
*Now, Who is J.P. Morgan and what is so important about him? In light of current events you will soon see this is a more relevant question then most ever even think to ask. Hmmm. I wonder why this info has never been discussed in the mainline news? The bottom line of the below is, can we trust what we are being told in the mainline news? It isn't just WHAT is being said that should concern us but what ISN'T being said. Not that I agree or disagree with Peter Arnett but his being fired is a perfect example of the control in media. It is the selection process of what is and ISN'T reported that is critical NOT just HOW it is presented, couched, spun etc etc.. We get caught up in "fair and balanced" reporting and "The no spin zone" so much we don't ever think about the fact that you don't need to spin or not spin what ISN'T being said. Most assume if something is vital and critical to the interest of the citizens of this country it WILL be in the news. That's putting a lot of faith in a system that has proven to misinform, misdirect and outright lie time after time. The following quotes speak for themselves.
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years... It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries". - David Rockefeller, in an address given to Catherine Graham, publisher of The Washington Post and other media luminaries in attendance in Baden Baden, Germany at the June 1991 annual meeting of the world elite Bilderberg Group.
"There is no such thing, at this date of the world's history in America, as an independent press You know it and I know it. There is not one of you who dare to write your honest opinions, and if you did, you know beforehand that it would never appear in print. I am paid weekly for keeping my honest opinion out of the paper I am connected with. Others of you are paid similar salaries for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be out on the street looking for another job. If I allowed my honest opinions to appear in one issue of my' paper, before twenty-four hours my occupation would be gone. The business of the journalist is to destroy the truth; to lie outright; to pervert; to vilify; to fawn at the feet of mammon, and to sell his country and his race for his daily bread. You know it and I know it and what folly is this toasting an independent press? We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our possibilities, and our lives are all the property of other men. We are intellectual prostitutes. - John Swinton, former chief of staff, The New York Times, in a 1953 speech before the New York Press Club
"We are going to impose our agenda on the coverage by dealing with issues and subjects that we choose to deal with". - Richard M. Cohen, former Senior Producer of CBS political news
"Our job is to give people not what they want, but what we decide they ought to have" - Richard Salant, former President of CBS News
*Now more about JP Morgan.
He happened to have signed the "Blackstone Petition", or Memorial, of 1891 that was a call to establish the State of Israel. This document was put together by William E. Blackstone, a real estate developer and unconventional minister who was also a student of John Nelson Darby, mentor of J.I. Scofield, who published the Scofield Bible. Darby is the recognized by many as the founder of Dispensationalism, an eschatological system built around the belief that the church is a parenthetical afterthought and God's agenda is all about the state of Israel which is temporarily on hold as the "church" is being gathered in. Current evangelical promoters of dispensational Zionism are Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Jack Van Impe, Hal Lindsey, author of the incredibly popular "The Late Great Planet Earth", and Tim Lahay, one of the authors of the best selling "Left Behind" series which is based on dispensationalism. Why is this significant? The main issue today is the middle east, particularly Iraq at present ( whose next, God only knows ) and terrorism in general. Well, guess why we have terrorism? Is it because it is prophecied? Or could it be in part because Moslems were ousted out of Palestine with the help of evangelical Dispensational Zionists along with a US Policy that supports the STATE of Israel no matter what. ( Loving the Jewish people and supporting the STATE of Israel I suggest are NOT one and the same. Nor is being a Christian synomous with being a dispensationalist. Unfortunately those who wish to have any discussion of the legitimacy of the STATE of Israel are almost immediately labeled "anti-Semitic" by the general population or heretics by the Christian community. A highly charged and emotional issue and I suggest also clever psychological manipulation and VERY effective in causing most to steer clear of any discussion of this topic.( I know because I used to think this way). I guess that makes www.jewsnotzionists.org anti-Semitic also. And they are Jewish! )
If you look at the attached chart, a large number of those tied to the banking system are Jewish and promoters of Zionism. The attached file shows a chart of the linear connection between the Rothschilds (Jewish) and the Bank of England, and the London banking houses which ultimately control the Federal Reserve Banks through their stockholdings of bank stock and their subsidiary firms in New York. The two principal Rothschild representatives in New York, J. P. Morgan Co., and Kuhn, Loeb & Co. ( Jewish ) were the firms which set up the Jekyll Island Conference at which the Federal Reserve Act was drafted, who directed the subsequent successful campaign to have the plan enacted into law by Congress, and who purchased the controlling amounts of stock in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in 1914. These firms had their principal officers appointed to the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Federal Advisory Council in 1914. In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. The Federal Reserve Act was passed in 1913. The purchasing of the major news papers was shortly after this in 1915 and so on. These, I suggest are not unrelated. There is a connection between the Federal Reserve Banking system our country has operated under since 1913, the controlled media, dispensationalism, Zionism and all events that have transpired in the middle East since the state of Israel came into existence in 1948 (then gained a more sure footing WITH the help of the USA after the 6 day war of Israel in 1967) after almost 2000 years of exile.
Now folks if you didn't just fall out of your chair, you either already knew this or you didn’t understand it and need to read it again.
You may not know or understand but the whole financial system upon which this country operates has been behind ever major war our country has been in since the American Revolution itself ( At that time the Rothchilds controlled the Banks that financed both Britain and the colonies. Why BOTH sides some may ask? Well they are bankers or should we say banksters?! ) and makes billions of dollars with each conflict. It is a PRIVATE banking interest and is no more Federal then Federal Express. So what, you may say! Well guess who our government owes the 6.something trillion dollars to? ( at least that is the "official" amount ) The Federal Reserve Banking system, a privately owned banking cartel. This is not only admitted by the Federal Reserve Banks but was also determined in a Federal Court case. If you don't understand and see the significance of this and all the implications, stop right now and got reread all the above again and then go off by yourself and think long and hard about it.NOW go back and reread the congressional record at the top of this page on who bought out the media way back in 1915, just two years after the 16th Amendment was passed in February of 1913, that appeared to authorize a direct tax on the earnings of citizens, the Income Tax Act was also passed later that fall and The Federal Reserve Act was passed right around the time Congress ajourned for Christmas, after most of the opposition to this Act had already gone home for the holidays. Coincidence, you ask? I don't think so. The congressional records say, " J.P. Morgan interests" bought most major papers at that time. (emphasis mine). Any idea who those interests might be? Sure it says, "the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interests, and their subsidiary organizations." But how do you think J.P. Morgan made the money to expand into all these interests? And what subsidiary organizations are they speaking of? Are you starting to put it together yet?
By the way conspiracy theory is conjecture based on suspicion. What conclusions you wish to make of the above facts is up to you. Opps! I almost forgot. This has never been in the news so I guess it can't be true. Shoot!! (that was an attempt at humor, just in case some didn't get it).
Below are excerpts from a court case proving the Federal Reserve system’s status. As you will see, the court ruled that the Federal Reserve Banks are "independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations", and there is not sufficient "federal government control over ‘detailed physical performance’ and ‘day to day operation’" of the Federal Reserve Bank for it to be considered a federal agency.:
Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (1982)
John L. Lewis, Plaintiff/Appellant,
v.
United States of America, Defendant/Appellee.
No. 80-5905
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 2, 1982.
Decided April 19, 1982.
As Amended June 24, 1982.
Plaintiff, who was injured by vehicle owned and operated by a federal reserve bank, brought action alleging jurisdiction under the Federal Tort Claims Act. The United States District Court for the Central District of California, David W. Williams, J., dismissed holding that federal reserve bank was not a federal agency within meaning of Act and that the court therefore lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. Appeal was taken. The Court of Appeals, Poole, Circuit Judge, held that federal reserve banks are not federal instrumentalities for purposes of the Act, but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations...
For more info contact
Exam Certified Independent Representative for the
Save A Patriot Fellowship
SITE LINKS
[
"No SSN Forms" ] [ IRS Agent jumps ship ] [
[
[ HELP US HELP AMERICA! ] [ COMMENTS-QUESTIONS! ]
[ NEW VICTORY EXPRESS!! ] [ Other Related Links! ]
[ The law says WHAT?! ] [They told the truth!! ] [ SAPF SUES IRS!]
[ Reasonable Action ] [ The Truth Behind the Income Tax! ] [ Products ]
[ Social Security? ] [ Tax Basics 101 ] [ Just the Facts ] [ What is SAP ]
[ UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION ] [ GAO AUDITS THE IRS! ]
[ Do you love America? How about the IRS? ] [ Why I did this site ]
